One woman’s response to Michelle Obama who told all women that they should have voted for Hillary because she is a woman and would represent women properly.
I still haven’t figured out why Hillary lost.
- Was it the Russians?
- Or was it Wikileaks?
- Or was it Podesta?
- Or Comey?
- Or was it a sexual predator husband?
- Or was it her chief of staff’s husband Wiener’s pictures of his penis?
- Was it a subpoena violation?
- Or was it the corrupt Clinton foundation?
- Or was it the congressional lies?
- Or was it the Benghazi bungle that cost several lives?
- Or was it pay for play?
- Or was it the travel gate scandal?
- Or was it the Whitewater scandal?
- Or the cattle gate scandal?
- Or the Trooper-Gate scandal?
- Or was it the $15 million for Chelsea’s apt bought with Clinton Foundation money?
- Or Comey’s investigation?
- Or her husband’s interference with Loretta Lynch and the investigation?
- Or was it stealing debate questions?
- Was it deleting forensic 30,000 emails?
- Was it the Seth Rich murder?
- Was it calling half the USA deplorable?
- Was it the underhanded immoral treatment of Bernie Sanders?
- Was it the Vince Foster murder?
- The Jennifer Flowers assault?
- The Jennifer Flowers settlement?
- The Paula Jones lawsuit?
- The $800,000 Paula Jones settlement?
- The lie about taking on sniper fire in Eastern Europe?
- The impeachment?
- The $6 billion she “lost” when in charge of the State Department?
- The $10 million she took for the pardon of Marc Rich?
Gee, I just can’t quite put my finger on it, but it seems to be right in front of me.
For a long time, I’ve been wondering where the whole story about President Trump and Russia began. At first thought, I recall asking myself who Vladimir Putin would want in the White House more, Clinton or Trump? Would Putin want a known quantity in Hillary Clinton? Granted, Hillary would have been a bit more hawkish than President Obama but that is like asking which is blander without butter and seasoning, grits or mashed potatoes.
Consider Hillary Clinton’s slogan (can you even remember it?) versus “Make America Great Again.” With those two slogans alone, pretend you are Vladimir Putin with a troubled economy that doesn’t want to see America great again. After all a strong American economy and military would put Russia further down on the stage of world influence. It is as plain as the nose on your face.
Just look at this excerpt from yesterday’s Washington Times (no supporter of President Trump).
Apparently, it’s Bill and Hillary Clinton who’ve been doing the behind-scenes and suspicious dealings with Russia all along. Oh, and perhaps others in the Barack Obama administration, too.
You think special counsel Robert Mueller might switch the target of his investigation any time soon? Seems a bit time-wasting — not to mention taxpayer dollar-wasting — to keep on the Trump trail, desperately searching for signs of a collusion that just didn’t happen.
Add to that today’s bombshell that was dropped about those who accused President Trump during the campaign pleading the fifth. Why would Vladimir Putin want a President Trump rather than a President Clinton considering the Obama Administration essentially gave away control of 20% of United States uranium to Russia?
Read full story. Excerpt below.
They also obtained an eyewitness account — backed by documents — indicating Russian nuclear officials had routed millions of dollars to the U.S. designed to benefit former President Bill Clinton’s charitable foundation during the time Secretary of State Hillary Clinton served on a government body that provided a favorable decision to Moscow, sources told The Hill.
Yes, it looks like Hillary Clinton was using the “Clinton Foundation” as a money laundering operation. No, it is not our imagination. No matter how hard Hillary Clinton supporters and President Trump haters want it not to be true, there it is. Apparently, it has all been a masterful spin job accusing President Trump of some kind of illegal dealings with Russia. All the while it was the Clinton’s with possible support from the Obama Administration colluding with the Russians.
Thanks to Navy man Norm for emailing me this video. It is funny when you look back at the liberal media and comedians.
I was thinking about the blood Hillary has on her hands. Some we know about, some we may never know about.
Ambassador Stevens’ Request for Security
Consider the fact that Ambassador Stevens (a friend of Hillary’s by her own account) made over 600 requests for extra security. As you can see from the testimony I linked to Hillary said none of those requests ever reached her. Some have asked me why Ambassador Stevens did not contact Hillary directly. Maybe Ambassador Stevens knew better than to email her to a non-secure email? I’m sure he remembered his security briefings about using non-secure email.
Hillary on Late Term Abortion
Next is Hillary on late-term abortion. She did not dispute in the Debate with Trump that she was fine with a woman terminating her child in the 7th, 8th or 9th month. WOW! She fell back the old “health of the mother” routine. Of course, if there is really a serious health threat to the mother nobody would prevent her from taking action to secure her own life. That is NOT what we are talking about. There are always exceptions for the mother’s health! This effects over 600 women per year and NOBODY would ask a woman to die. That is NOT Hillary’s view. She would allow it for any reason. 80% of Women oppose late-term abortion according to a Jan 2016 Marist Poll.
It’s Not Gun Control it is the ACLU / Democratic Views
Hillary’s policies related to gun sentencing guidelines is another way she has blood on her hands. Like it or not, the truth is Hillary does not want to stop gun violence using techniques that work. After all Gun Control is a major Democratic talking point. If gun violence is to be brought under control you need to do two simple things that Hillary does not support.
Use Stop & Frisk. Hillary and the Democrats say it is Unconstitutional. While it is controversial in particular cases the truth is it is fully in line with the Constitution. This was the Supreme Court of the United States Ruling in 1968. The case cited in the debate was about a particular case in New York that was never fully resolved due to a Socialist Mayor being elected who wanted to stop the practice. See below for details on Stop & Frisk.
The Court was also concerned that requiring probable cause for a frisk would put an officer in unwarranted danger during the investigation. The “sole justification” for a frisk, said the Court, is the “protection of the police officer and others nearby.” Because of this narrow scope, a frisk must be “reasonably designed to discover guns, knives, clubs, or other hidden instruments for the assault of the police officer.” As long as an officer has reasonable suspicion, a stop and frisk is constitutional under the Fourth Amendment. ~ Read the full definition by clicking here.
Longer Mandatory Penalties for crimes related to guns is another thing that would fix the problem. Hillary does not support this solution. You might remember the large number of “carjackings” that took place in the 1980’s and early 1990’s. Carjacking was quickly solved by making it a Federal Crime carrying prison terms of 15 to 25 years when no bodily harm occurred and up to life in prison or the death sentence. See below for carjacking penalties.
(1) be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 15 years, or both,
(2) if serious bodily injury (as defined in section 1365 of this title, including any conduct that, if the conduct occurred in the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States, would violate section 2241 or 2242 of this title) results, be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 25 years, or both, and
(3) if death results, be fined under this title or imprisoned for any number of years up to life, or both, or sentenced to death. See more notes by clicking here.
The NRA, Republicans or Conservatives do not stand in the way of mandatory minimums for violent crimes committed with guns. The Democrats, ACLU and other Left Wing groups are the ones against common sense laws. The other problem is we do not apply the laws we have at our disposal due to Liberal judges.
Ask yourself this simple question. Would you commit a crime with a gun if you knew it would result in a minimum life sentence?
So, how much blood is on Hillary’s hands? We may never know but it is sure to increase if she gets elected.
I’ve been watching Doug Schoen for a long time now. He is an “old-fashioned” Democrat as far as I’m concerned. I’m talking about the older generation like my aunts and grandmother. They were very good patriotic people who anyone would have loved to know. They supported the old JFK saying “Ask not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country.” It has been a long time since we have words even close to that (1961). I was just three years old!
I admire Doug for his courage. It is hard to turn on long time friends, especially in such a high-profile position. Imagine what it must have taken for Doug to withdraw his support. If you want the follow-up 13 minute interview with Doug click here. I’ve inserted the short version below and he expands on it the next day. I would not someone thinking I took his comments out of context.
I saw a split screen of Hillary landing in Florida as Trump finished up his rally in Colorado today. It was a stark contrast. There is Trump surrounded by thousands and thousands of cheering supporters. Hillary lands and is met by maybe 4 people.
Do we really need to pay the Secret Service to protect her from a 4 people? LOL. I’m sorry for disturbing your day if you got this as an email, I just had to share this.