We Believe That Donald Trump Is A Better Choice Than Hillary Clinton To Move Our Military In The Right Direction As President Of The United States.
The following open letter supporting Donald Trump’s defense plan was released today by the country’s most experienced and renowned defense experts including current and former congressional leaders like Michael McCaul and Peter Hoekstra; distinguished military leaders like General Bob Magnus and Medal of Honor recipient Major General James Livingston; and former senior executive branch appointees like Secretary of the Air Force Michael Wynne. These leaders represent hundreds of years of combined experience defending this country and its national security interests. The letter can be viewed below:
“As individuals who have served our country in Congress, the Executive Branch, or in uniform, we write to support strongly Donald Trump’s recently released plan to rebuild our military.
‘Over the last eight years, the U.S. military has been faced with reckless cuts by the Obama Administration and the dangers incurred by defense sequestration. Concurrently, the world has grown increasingly dangerous and unstable, from ISIS attacks around the world to Russian intervention in Eastern Europe to Chinese adventurism in the South China Sea. Cutting commissary benefits by 30% and restricting cost of living raises to 1.6% send a telling message to our warriors, many of whom spent 50% of their careers in combat zones.
‘Our military requires a serious and substantial investment to overcome the neglect of recent years and rebuild to meet tomorrow’s challenges and threats. The bipartisan National Defense Panel has stipulated that $611 billion was the minimum defense spending required to meet the national security requirements of our country. We are confident Mr. Trump is committed to removing the sequester limit on Defense spending and to increasing the level of investment in defense so our war fighters are properly trained, equipped and ready to face ever more complex threats with dominant military strength.
‘We believe that Mr. Trump, in consultation with us and distinguished experts in the national security community, will work with active military leadership and Congress to establish and implement a serious and comprehensive long-term plan to rebuild our services. Our military force structure must be based on sound operational plans driven by a thorough and unvarnished threat assessment. Looking to the future, it is not unrealistic to set a target force structure, which would include a 350 ship Navy, an Army with an end strength of 540,000, an Air Force of at least 1,200 active fighter aircraft, and a Marine Corps of 36 battalions. Such growth phased within budget reality represents the kind of targeted investment our services need today and is grounded in the kind of serious and sober strategic thinking our country needs in these perilous times by a peace through strength policy. Mr. Trump’s intention to reform the Defense Department, including a full audit and focused acquisition reform, is much needed and long overdue. His commitment to a comprehensive ballistic missile defense is indispensable in a world of rogue actors and missile proliferation. And we appreciate his understanding of the cyber threat and the steps we must take to defeat it.
‘The men and women of our nation’s military have served gallantly over the last fifteen years, and we as a country owe them a debt that can never fully be repaid. We must now provide them every resource necessary to execute their missions and come home safely.We believe that Donald Trump is a better choice than Hillary Clinton to move our military in the right direction as President of the United States.”
To view the full list of Defense Experts, click here
XPERTS PRAISING DONALD J. TRUMP’S DEFENSE PLAN,trump pence
Scopelliti’s Dawn Analysis – When Triangles Break – 24 October 2016 General Thoughts Clinton has, for the moment, broken to the upside of her current triangle. Trump has broken to the downside of his. Wisdom demands that we NOT overact, but it also demands that we look. The numbers we’re tracking here do, now, favor Clinton, as least for the moment. So what do we Trump supporters do with bad news? We get tough is what we do. A possible Clinton victory is not new information. We’ve always known that could happen, and that the establishment forces might block our guy. Also, no matter how strongly committed to our data we may be, we must always remember that even our own data may be off in many ways. There is one form of data we must recognize that we don’t have. Our poll does NOT measure New Voters. If New Voters are still both enthusiastic and growing in number, we’ll win no matter what. If other polling methods either weight too heavily to Democrats, or too heavily to 2014 models, etc., then they can’t show the “hidden support” that Trump enjoys. But sadly, neither can we. Our 3,000 respondents give us depth and breadth, but they do not provide us with a new voter measure. That covered, our resolve must be clear. We look, we see, and then we decide what we’re going to do. Me? I’m going to redouble my efforts and I hope you will too.
I so desperately wanted Clinton to break to the downside. She didn’t, she broke to the upside of her triangle. As a Dialectical Analyst – and I’ll discuss that in a moment – I was tempted to draw a new trading channel for her in a bull market formation. But, the data does not call for that yet. If it does tomorrow, or in coming days, I will document it. But right now, let’s talk a little bit about Dialectical Analysis. Dialectical Analysis is composed of three steps: 1.) What I want to see. 2.) What I don’t want to see. 3.) Where I stand considering both. Here’s how that structure plays out relative to the graph above. 1.) What I do want to see is that America will allow Donald to be the shock-jock style celebrity he’s always been, and NOT care about his sex life (as it NEVER cared about Bill Clinton’s) and dedicate itself to what is right for the country. 2.) What I don’t want to see, or believe, is that America will forgive Clinton for her crimes. 3.) Where I stand is…the outcome itself is simply not that important. That is, either candidate is so flawed that we, real America, we must take charge of our own futures no matter what happens on 8 November.
Trump broke his support line one time previously. The break lasted four days. My conclusion therefore is that we’ll need to see what happens over the coming three days before we can determine whether we’re building a new formation or not. It isn’t easy being a chart watcher. But, it is honorable!
We have to face a big break today, friends. Clinton up, Trump down. So maybe we all need to send Trump love and support. And, maybe we all need to decide how to go win this for him, instead of depending on him to win it for us. In any case, there’s no point not looking.
So let me ask. What will you do? Me, I’m going to reach out to every team member I know and support them in their efforts. I won’t overreact. But I will look with eyes wide clear.
We’ve discussed confirmation bias, the risk of seeing the data what you want to see. It is the great enemy of proper analysis. And so it is with great trepidation that I say…a tie equals winning. Consider the factors in favor of Clinton, the entire media elite stumping for her as it never has in the history of America; being the first female candidate for president; all her power and reach; her safety from any wrongdoing; and most important of all, the Republican Establishment and #NeverTrump people such as the Bush dynasty all 100% on her side…and more…
Consider all of Trump’s weaknesses which need not be mentioned.
And yet here we are tied. And here’s how I’ll attack my own beloved poll. Since it has worked with the same 3,000 people from its inception – which is one of its greatest strengths – what it cannot measure is new people coming into the mix. I have a lead on an analysis that can solve the problem, and soon as I’ve finished researching it, I’ll tell you all about it. In the meantime, I say…
A tie is winning! I just can’t not be happy, happier, in fact, than I could have pictured. I say we’ve got this.
Danger Will Robinson! Clinton’s support is still rising. And, this is a new, higher resistance line as we discussed previously. These are clear danger signs to be sure. If she’s going to break out to the upside, it kind of has to happen soon, and if it does, I’ll be devastated. For now though, and for all this danger, I’m not unhappy. Quite the contrary! I’m not showing it right now, but I believe that the same long term channel support and resistance lines are still there, waiting to reassert their force. The reason I don’t show them right now is that the 38-day old support line must be respected. If it continues, we’re going to have a hard time winning. You can feel the titanic forces in opposition here, mightily.
We chartists are NOT supposed to be true believers. But, I confess, I can’t help myself. Look at the beautiful, perfect support line underneath the entire election cycle so far. There’s no way that a Trump supporter like me could do anything but thrill to such a line. Wow!
Now, what about current, steeply strengthening resistance? It’s too steep to sustain. In fact, maybe just by a scosche, today’s tiny little rise may be the indication of a coming break in resistance…and if so…thank goodness! I’d sure love to see a great leap, but I fear we have too little time for that, so I’ll probably have to take my lumps for having thought we’d do better. But, if we squeak out a victory I’ll still be happy. On the other hands, Clinton may take the lead, or we might catapult upward shockingly. No telling yet, that’s for sure. Yep, we’re still absolutely tied.
So the question is, how will this tie break? I know, all the traditional models have Clinton way ahead in the electoral college count. And no, this data does not give us any indication of electoral votes. So why am I so happy? I just say again, right now, a tie feels like winning to me. And as I indicated above, I have some new information I’m researching that I hope to share with you tomorrow morning, assuming it pans out. For now, let’s just enjoy a day where a tie means we are not losing yet, and we may well be setting up a huge victory.
I was reviewing chats on-line and I believe all the Catholics & Christians saying they can’t vote for Donald J Trump, but I truly believe in my heart they will vote for him in the end,
Here is my reply to fellow Catholics & Christians,
You say as a Christian you can’t vote for Donald J Trump I understand that. I felt the same way as a Catholic, but I will be forced to look past Donald’s individual indiscretions .All things aside I’ll be forced to do whatever it takes to protect my Family & my human rights to practice my religion.
When Obama took office there was no ISIS, “there was no ISIS” Obama and Hillary thought ISIS was the JV Team, did very little to stop ISIS and now their in 30 countries.
ISIS cut off the human head of a priest on an altar during mass and ISIS is beheading christians on the beaches letting their heads drift to sea.
You and I must pray it does not happen in our church on our Sunday to our family.
We would sit there saying this can’t be real as ISIS calls up to the altar one family member after another, thinking this is not happening not in our church not during our mass not my children not in America this can’t be happening it can’t be lord please it can’t be.
911 Less we forget
Let Us Pray
Trump for president 2017-2025
PS Hillary tampered with the integrity of the election when she paid thugs to incite violence at her opponents events and blamed the violence she paid to incite on her opponent thus deceiving the voting process and affecting the results through swaying the vote with unlawful deception.
She sure is crooked for a lawyer just who can you trust if you can’t trust a lawyer or a politician or your representative in government who can you trust.
Welcome to “The Roman Empire 2.0”
I recommend my fellow Catholics & Christians read or watch “Clinton Cash” and watch the video of thugs inciting violence at Trump events the same community organizers that visit the White House daily to get their marching orders are thy one in the same?.