I received an email from a new veteran friend. He sent me an article that was misattributed to Marshall Kamena. It was really written by Evan Sayet. Marshall was a Democratic Mayor as the email suggests but he did not write the article.
Evan wrote a great and compelling argument for President Trump’s way of doing things. Click here to read Evan’s article. It is a fantastic read and rings true.
The question comes to my mind; Why do people misattribute emails? I have a theory. When someone writes something as compelling as Evan Sayet the leftists cannot deny the truth of it. I believe the left is the one who misattributes these compelling stories. They do this so they can later claim it was bogus.
The story was not bogus but by misattributing it they can cast a shadow of doubt over the entire story. If you cannot get the author or his political affiliation correct how much else is false? Nevermind the impact of what is being said. The misattribution becomes the story rather than the story itself.
I believe intentional misattribution is part of the lefts Psychological Operations. I encourage all my fellow veterans and Americans to have a basic understanding of PsyOps. Below is a one paragraph definition that may help you spot it in the media and around the web.
Psychological operations (PSYOP) are planned operations to convey selected information and indicators to audiences to influence their emotions, motives, and objective reasoning, and ultimately the behavior of governments, organizations, groups, and individuals.
Understand more about PsyOps at Wikipedia.
Discover more from Veterans for Trump
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
I don’t think the left are the ones misattributing articles. I have seen so many articles on conservative websites and Facebook posts in order to make the story more compelling, and to get more clicks. The more clicks, the more shares. This is how Russia’s misinformation campaign worked in the 2016 election.
As per the original article, the author didn’t offer any substance, but just partisan rancor. The attribution to another person makes it more believable to the reader. It’s not to discredit. It takes a determined person to discredit by finding the truth of the situation.
Evan’s article is filled with common sense for anyone who has been around for the past 50 years or more. Younger readers would be lost. Heck, most youngsters can’t even tell you what the Civil War was about or when it was. All I can suggest is you take off your partisan hat and read the article with some objectivity.