Inauguration Day 2025: A Historic Moment
During President Trump’s inauguration speech, Joe Biden and Kamala Harris found themselves in a profoundly embarrassing position. As Trump systematically outlined the failures of the previous administration in areas like border security, economic policy, and international relations, the expressions on Biden and Harris’s faces were of clear discomfort and defeat.
Trump’s promise to rectify these issues, contrasting sharply with the policies of the last four years, left them visibly dejected. They sat in silence, heads slightly bowed, as each critique seemed to underscore their tenure’s shortcomings, a stark reminder of their political eclipse under the bright light of Trump’s victorious return. The atmosphere was thick with the palpable sense of a public rebuke, making the moment not just a political transition but a personal and professional low for all outgoing Democrats.
Inauguration Day Speech Highlights
Declaration of a "Golden Age"
President Trump announced the beginning of a “golden age” for America, promising a rejuvenation of the nation’s status and prosperity.
Critique of the Previous Administration
President Trump blamed the Biden administration for various national issues like border security, economic decline, and loss of international respect, vowing to reverse these trends.
Immigration Policy Overhaul
President Trump declared a national emergency at the southern border, pledged to end “catch and release,” and restore the “Remain in Mexico” policy to tighten border control.
Economic Revival
President Trump committed to bringing manufacturing jobs back to the U.S., focusing on energy independence with policies like “drill, baby, drill,” and tackling inflation attributed to previous “overspending.”
Withdrawal from International Agreements
President Trump announced plans to withdraw from the Paris Climate Agreement again, emphasizing his “America First” approach to foreign policy.
Social and Cultural Policies
President Trump promised to enforce a policy recognizing only two genders, male and female, and aimed to end what he described as racial and gender-based social engineering.
Justice and Pardons
President Trump spoke of restoring “fair, equal, and impartial justice” by ending the “weaponization” of the Justice Department and committed to pardoning those involved in the January 6 Capitol riot, referring to them as “J6 hostages.”
Biden Pardons
Joe Biden’s actions seem to contradict his public stance on the independence of the Department of Justice (DOJ), especially in light of recent developments. For years, we’ve been told by the administration that there was no “lawfare” directed at Donald Trump, with the argument being that the DOJ operates independently. However, if this were genuinely the case, and if we could fully trust our justice system to act without bias, there would be no need for Biden to preemptively pardon anyone, including members of his own family or those involved in politically sensitive investigations. Biden’s move to grant these pardons suggests he might not fully trust in the DOJ’s independence after all. As the saying goes, actions speak louder than words, and these actions cast doubt on the narrative that has been pushed by the media regarding the impartiality of legal actions against Trump.
Security Clearance Revocation
As of January 21, 2025, President Donald Trump has signed an executive order to revoke the security clearances of 51 former intelligence officials who signed a letter in October 2020 suggesting that reports about Hunter Biden’s laptop bore “all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation.”
Key Points:
Reason for Revocation: The action was taken because these officials suggested the Hunter Biden laptop story might be Russian disinformation, a claim that has since been heavily debated as the authenticity of the laptop was later acknowledged by various sources, including during Hunter Biden’s legal proceedings.
Legal and Political Reaction: The move has sparked discussions about the legality and political motivations behind it. Some legal experts argue that such an action could face judicial review, particularly if it’s seen as bypassing existing security clearance revocation protocols that mandate due process. Critics have labeled this as a retaliatory move by Trump against perceived political enemies within the intelligence community, while supporters view it as holding accountable those who might have influenced the 2020 election with misleading information.
Impact on Individuals: Many of the officials in question are retired and might not hold active clearances, potentially limiting the practical impact on their careers. However, this action sends a strong political message and could affect their ability to engage in consultancy or other roles requiring access to classified information.
Additional Actions: Alongside this, Trump’s order also targeted his former National Security Advisor, John Bolton, for publishing a memoir considered to reveal sensitive information.
Broader Context:
This executive action is part of a larger series of orders Trump signed on his first day back in office, indicating his administration’s intent to revisit and possibly reverse policies from the previous administration, including those related to security, free speech, and environmental policies.
There’s ongoing debate about the balance between political accountability and the independence of intelligence officials in expressing their views, especially on matters that could influence national elections.
Public and Political Sentiment:
Posts on X (formerly Twitter) reflect a polarized view, with some celebrating the move as a necessary step to punish political interference, while others see it as an overreach of executive power aimed at settling political scores.
This action marks a notable moment in the ongoing discourse about the role of intelligence officials in political discourse, the influence of disinformation in elections, and the extent to which political leaders can use their authority to affect the careers of former government officials.
Removing presidential appointees
-
Jose Andres from the President’s Council on Sports, Fitness and Nutrition
-
Mark Milley from the National Infrastructure Advisory Council
-
Brian Hook from the Wilson Center for Scholars
-
Keisha Lance Bottoms from the President’s Export Council
Stargate
-
OpenAI, known for its AI tools like ChatGPT,
-
Oracle, a major player in data center operations,
-
SoftBank, with its deep financial resources, are the primary investors in this project. The venture plans to start with an immediate investment of $100 billion, with the potential to scale up to $500 billion over four years.
-
Infrastructure Development: The investment is earmarked for creating extensive AI infrastructure, particularly in building data centers across the U.S., with the first project already under construction in Texas. This infrastructure will support both the training and deployment of advanced AI models.
-
Job Creation: Trump claimed that this project would create over 100,000 American jobs “almost immediately.”
-
Geopolitical Strategy: The initiative is framed as a move to ensure U.S. dominance in AI technology against competitors like China, highlighting the strategic importance of AI in national security, economy, and technological leadership.
-
Healthcare: Among the touted benefits, there’s an emphasis on AI potentially revolutionizing healthcare, with mentions of early cancer detection and vaccine development.
-
Energy and Resources: The project underscores the need for significant energy resources to power these data centers, acknowledging AI’s high energy consumption.
-
Stocks of involved companies saw positive movements following the announcement, with Oracle’s stock rising nearly 5% in after-hours trading and SoftBank’s stock increasing by over 9% in Japan.
-
There’s a mix of optimism and skepticism regarding the actual impact of this investment, with some viewing it as a sign of continued tech innovation, while others are wary of the promises made, drawing parallels to past large-scale investments in technology that didn’t fully meet expectations.
-
Posts on X range from excitement about the potential for AI to solve real-world problems like healthcare to skepticism about the benefits reaching the average person, with concerns about the concentration of wealth and power in big tech.
Executive Orders Summary
-
National Emergency at the Border – Declares a national emergency to allow military deployment to secure the border.
-
Border Closure – Orders the immediate closure of the U.S.-Mexico border to all but legal entries.
-
End Birthright Citizenship – Attempts to end citizenship for children born to undocumented immigrants.
-
Remain in Mexico – Reinstates the policy where asylum seekers wait in Mexico for U.S. court hearings.
-
Catch and Release Termination – Ends the practice of releasing migrants into the U.S. while their cases are processed.
-
Designation of Cartels as Terrorists – Classifies drug cartels and some gangs as foreign terrorist organizations.
-
Refugee Program Suspension – Halts refugee resettlement for four months for a security review.
-
Enhanced Border Vetting – Orders enhanced vetting for all immigrants, especially from areas with security risks.
-
Military Deployment for Border Wall – Directs military assistance in building or maintaining border barriers.
-
Categorical Parole Termination – Ends parole programs that allow certain groups entry for humanitarian reasons.
-
Withdrawal from Paris Agreement – Officially withdraws the U.S. from the Paris Climate Accord.
-
National Energy Emergency – Declares an emergency to expedite energy project approvals.
-
End Electric Vehicle Mandates – Revokes Biden’s push for electric vehicle adoption.
-
Alaska Energy Projects – Reverses restrictions on drilling and mining in Alaska.
-
LNG Export Projects – Restarts application reviews for LNG export projects.
-
Hiring Freeze – Freezes federal hiring with exceptions for military and public safety.
-
Return to Office – Mandates federal workers return to in-person work.
-
Schedule F Order – Reinstates policy allowing easier dismissal of federal employees.
-
Review of National Security Memoranda – Orders a review of Biden-era national security policies.
-
End Diversity Programs – Terminates federal DEI (Diversity, Equity, Inclusion) programs.
-
Cabinet and Subcabinet Appointments – Establishes acting leadership in various departments.
-
Jan 6 Pardons – Pardons approximately 1,500 individuals convicted from the Capitol riot.
-
Commutation of Sentences – Shortens sentences for leaders of groups involved in the Capitol riot.
-
End Political Persecutions – Directs agencies to review actions against political figures from Biden’s term.
-
Death Penalty for Certain Crimes – Mandates death penalty for specific offenses by undocumented immigrants.
-
Inflation Combat – Directs agencies to take actions against inflation.
-
Foreign Aid Suspension – Pauses new foreign aid commitments for 90 days.
-
Gender Definition – Requires government recognition of only two sexes.
-
End of Transgender Military Service – Sets the stage for reinstating a ban on transgender military service.
-
Withdrawal from WHO – Begins process to exit the World Health Organization.
-
Cuba’s Terrorism Status – Re-adds Cuba to the list of state sponsors of terrorism.
-
TikTok Ban Suspension – Delays enforcement of TikTok ban for 75 days.
-
Gulf of Mexico Naming – Changes the name to “Gulf of America.”
-
Not all actions might fall under the formal category of “executive orders” as some could be memoranda, proclamations, or other directives.
-
The exact list and count might vary as some actions were announced but not detailed, and some might be under different classifications.
Discover more from Veterans for Trump
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.