Mac and Mike ask questions about the J6 hearings. What is a hearing supposed to look like? What do they hope to achieve? Why bring in a hearsay witness that was immediately discredited by Secret Service agents that were actually there? Why continue it any longer?
Since the video recording last week I have come to a simple conclusion. Look what has been in the news since the hearings have been on break. The focus immediately went back to the following:
- Gas and food prices
- Baby formula & supply chain shortages continue
- The Biden-Made Disaster at the border
- The amount of money America is putting into Ukraine
- Biden and Harris incapable of being articulate or solving problems
- The release of our Strategic Oil Reserve to China!
- The audio recording verifying Joe Biden lied about being involved in Hunter’s dealings with China.
It is all about distracting people but it is not working.
O’Reilly makes some good points as well.
Discover more from Veterans for Trump
Subscribe to get the latest posts to your email.
You are absolutely right! It is very important that the hearings continue! Just look at all the evidence about Jan 6 coming out! And not one iota of evidence of Election Fraud.
What is your response to the testimony about Trump’s role? All lies? What parts are the lies? And what really happened?
Funny how the people who chant “Lock her up” even when 8 investigations by the Senate Republicans failed to turn up any wrong doing in regards to Benghazi by HRC. Yet they ignore the voluminous amount of evidence that is coming out about Trump’s involvement.
In a little bit off topic, who told Trump that there was Election Fraud? Every single person directly involved in the Election said that there was no Fraud? So where did the story come from? Giuliani?
And why can’t the GOP produce ANY evidence of the fraud?
Mac and I have discussed this all in detail. https://www.macandmike.com/january-6th-hearings/
I know I have previously sent these links on the election of 2020 but here they are again.
https://www.macandmike.com/?s=election
I wonder if the left will side with those who want Joe Biden impeached for his dealings with Hunter, Ukraine and China now that the laptop has been exposed. Again, if you want a short answer on election fraud there you have it. Big Tech rigged the election along with all those lying intel folks.
I’m not heartbroken that Joe was put into office. Americans too young to remember Carter need another dose of why you should not vote Democrat. I look forward to 12 years of pragmatic rule after Joe and Kami are gone. Of course, I will be long dead by then but at least my kids will have learned the lesson in their generation.
Funny, I don’t remember talking about Hunter. It seems that you, and most Republicans, are a lot more concerned about the information on the laptop of a private citizen than any facts pointing to Jan 6 and the Election.
It looks like an attempt to sidetrack the conversation since you have no answers. You did not respond to hardly any of my comments.
What about the findings of the Committee? You don’t seem too concerned about the damming testimony against Trump.
Is everyone lying?
Are all the “facts” made-up?
Is there any explanations for Trump’s actions/inactions?
Who did tell Trump that there was Election Fraud?
Why can’t the GOP produce any evidence of the fraud? Evidence being who, what, where, when and how! The GOP has produced ZERO evidence. Not even the 60+ lawsuits were about fraud!
What is the GOP waiting for?
Why are you so concerned about Hunter when he has no connection to Government? What about the Trump kids’ crimes?
You asked about election fraud. The Hunter laptop revealed Joe was lying about being involved in his son’s business dealings. The Big Tech and other media along with Intel people who suggested it was Russian disinformation is election fraud. This created artificial results which is by definition fraud. You also did not take the time to reference my links or you would know more.
Your litany of questions can be answered succinctly. The findings of a committee that does not allow both sides to speak cannot arrive at any more than an accusation. “Bobby punched me said Johnny.” What you don’t know is Johnny had thrown a rock and hit Bobby first. See how that works?